Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (65)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gherardi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gherardi, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gherardi, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 350, pp. 1575-1584, September 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Endogenous ABA maintains shoot growth in tomato independently of effects on plant water balance: evidence for an interaction with ethylene

Robert E. Sharp1, Mary E. LeNoble, Mark A. Else2, Eleanor T. Thorne and Francesca Gherardi

Department of Agronomy, Plant Sciences Unit, 1–87 Agriculture Building, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA

Received 12 January 2000; Accepted 9 May 2000


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To examine whether the reduced shoot growth of abscisic acid (ABA)-deficient mutants of tomato is independent of effects on plant water balance, flacca and notabilis were grown under controlled-humidity conditions so that their leaf water potentials were equal to or higher than those of well-watered wild-type plants throughout development. Most parameters of shoot growth remained markedly impaired and root growth was also greatly reduced. Additional experiments with flacca showed that shoot growth substantially recovered when wild-type levels of ABA were restored by treatment with exogenous ABA, even though improvement in leaf water potential was prevented. The ability of applied ABA to increase growth was greatest for leaf expansion, which was restored by 75%. The ethylene evolution rate of growing leaves was doubled in flacca compared to the wild type and treatment with silver thiosulphate to inhibit ethylene action partially restored shoot growth. The results demonstrate that normal levels of endogenous ABA are required to maintain shoot development, particularly leaf expansion, in well-watered tomato plants, independently of effects on plant water balance. The impairment of shoot growth caused by ABA deficiency is at least partly attributable to ethylene.

Key words: Abscisic acid, ABA, ethylene, shoot growth, flacca, notabilis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abscisic acid (ABA) is generally regarded as an inhibitor of shoot growth (Trewavas and Jones, 1991Go; Davies, 1995Go; Munns and Cramer, 1996Go). Most of the research underlying this view has involved applications of ABA or correlations of developmental changes to altered endogenous ABA levels. In general, ABA applications have resulted in inhibition of leaf and stem growth; the reduction of shoot growth in plants experiencing water deficits or other adverse environmental conditions often correlates with endogenous ABA accumulation. However, interpretation of these results is complicated by uncertainty that effects of applied ABA are predictive of the role of endogenous ABA (Trewavas and Jones, 1991Go; Sharp et al., 1994Go).

Paradoxically, ABA-deficient mutants are often shorter and exhibit smaller leaves compared with the corresponding wild types (Quarrie, 1987Go). Interest has focused on the tomato mutants flacca (flc), notabilis (not) and sitiens (sit ), and several authors have reported that leaf and stem growth of these mutants can be substantially restored by applying ABA (Imber and Tal, 1970Go; Tal and Nevo, 1973Go; Bradford, 1983Go; Neill et al., 1986Go; Nagel et al., 1994Go). In addition to reduced growth, ABA-deficient mutants are typically wilty even though the soil is well supplied with water. In the tomato mutants, this results from both high stomatal conductance and decreased plant hydraulic conductance, and these effects can also be prevented by applying ABA (Imber and Tal, 1970Go; Tal and Nevo, 1973Go; Bradford, 1983Go). Accordingly, several authors have attributed the inhibition of leaf and stem growth to shoot water deficits, and the growth-promotive effect of applied ABA in these cases to its ability to restore a favourable water balance (Bradford, 1983Go; Neill et al., 1986Go; Trewavas and Jones, 1991Go; Nagel et al., 1994Go; Léon-Kloosterziel et al., 1996Go). Consequently, these findings have generally not been regarded as evidence against a direct inhibitory role of ABA in shoot growth, although the observations have led some authors to question this view (Jones et al., 1987Go; Quarrie, 1987Go; Taylor, 1987Go; Zeevaart and Creelman, 1988Go; Abou-Mandour and Hartung, 1992Go).

The alternative possibility is that endogenous ABA is required to maintain shoot growth independently of its effect on plant water balance. Recent work in this laboratory has shown that an important role of ABA accumulation in the maintenance of root elongation at low water potentials in maize seedlings is to prevent excess ethylene production (Spollen et al., 2000Go), confirming ideas suggested by others (Wright, 1980Go; Bradford and Hsiao, 1982Go). Consistent with this finding, it was reported that ethylene production was enhanced in shoots of flc (Tal et al., 1979Go) and in whole plants of an ABA-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis (Rakitina et al., 1994Go) grown under well-watered conditions. In the case of flc, it was also shown that ethylene production could be restored to normal levels with exogenous ABA. (It should be noted, however, that enhanced ethylene production in flc was not reproduced in a study by Neill et al., 1986Go). Further, the ABA-deficient mutants of tomato often exhibit morphological symptoms characteristic of excess ethylene, such as leaf epinasty and adventitious rooting (Tal, 1966Go; Nagel et al., 1994Go). Despite these early observations and the fact that ethylene is usually inhibitory to shoot growth of terrestrial plants (Abeles et al., 1992Go), the possibility that ethylene is a cause of reduced shoot growth in ABA-deficient mutants has not been assessed.

To distinguish between these possibilities, it is necessary to examine the growth of ABA-deficient mutants in the absence of shoot water deficits. If the reduced shoot growth normally observed is caused by adverse water relations, then under such conditions growth should be restored or even enhanced relative to wild-type plants. On the other hand, if endogenous ABA is required to maintain shoot growth independently of effects on plant water balance, then the mutants should remain smaller. This question has not been definitively addressed. flc, not and sit have been grown under mist and it was observed that stem height became greater than in the wild type, consistent with ABA playing an inhibitory role in stem elongation (Jones et al., 1987Go). In contrast, later formed leaves remained smaller and total leaf biomass remained substantially reduced in the mutants. However, leaf water potentials also remained considerably lower than in the wild type, so interpretation of the role of ABA in leaf growth was not possible. Partial alleviation of shoot growth inhibition in double mutants of flc , not and sit grown at high relative humidity (RH) has been noted (Taylor, 1987Go), but information on plant water relations was not included so, again, full interpretation was not possible. In other studies in which flc was grown at high RH, effects on growth were not reported (Puri and Tal, 1977Go; Tal et al., 1979Go).

This study assessed whether the reduced shoot growth of flc and not is attributable to water deficits by growing the plants under controlled-humidity conditions such that the leaf water potentials of the mutants were equal to or higher than those of well-watered wild-type plants throughout development. In addition, the involvement of ethylene in the inhibition of shoot growth in flc under these conditions was examined.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plant material and growth conditions
Seeds of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cvs Rheinlands Ruhm (RR) and Ailsa Craig (AC) and the ABA-deficient mutants flc in the RR (isogenic) and AC (near isogenic) backgrounds and not in the AC background (near isogenic) were obtained from the CM Rick Tomato Genetics Resource Center, University of California, Davis, USA. The flc mutant is impaired in the oxidation of ABA aldehyde to ABA (Taylor et al., 1988Go; Marin and Marion-Poll, 1997Go), and the not mutant has a defect in the synthesis of xanthoxin, which is considered a key control step in ABA biosynthesis (Burbidge et al., 1999Go). When indicated with the corresponding wild type, the background of flc is not specified.

Seeds were treated with 2.6% sodium hypochlorite solution for 30 min, rinsed for 1 h in flowing tap water, and sown individually in 7 cm diameter, 290 cm3 plastic pots filled with a 2 : 1 (v/v) mixture of Green Formula Growing Mix (Lambert Peat Moss, Inc., Quebec, Canada) and sand containing 2 g 1000 cm-3 of a slow release fertilizer (Osmocote 17-6-12 with micronutrients). The pots were placed in a controlled environment chamber with a day/night temperature of 26/20 °C and a 14 h photoperiod. The photon flux density at plant height was 600 µmol photons m-2 s-1 photosynthetically active radiation supplied by cool-white fluorescent and incandescent lamps. The day/night RH was 92/95% until day 4 (emergence was defined as day zero), and then varied according to the genotype and treatment as detailed below. Pots were watered via capillary matting, which was irrigated with deionized water four times daily. On day 6, seedlings were selected for uniformity and transplanted (without removal from the soil) into 17 cm diameter, 2500 cm3 plastic pots containing the same growth medium. After transplanting, supplemental nutrient solution (Peters Professional 20-10-20 with micronutrients, 0.5 g l-1, Grace-Sierra Horticultural Products Co., Milpitas, California, USA) was supplied twice a week until day 26 and then every 2 d (200 ml per pot).

Applications of ABA and silver thiosulphate
In some experiments, plants of flc (RR background) were sprayed with 10 µM (±)-ABA (Sigma). This concentration was used because it had been found that the treatment resulted in substantial recovery of shoot growth (Bradford, 1983Go). Wild-type plants were not treated because this would have raised the ABA content above normal levels. The effect of spraying with silver thiosulphate (STS), an inhibitor of ethylene action (Beyer, 1976Go), was examined in both flc and RR plants. Preliminary experiments determined that the optimum concentration for restoration of shoot growth in flc was 250 µM; higher concentrations resulted in severe toxicity. Solutions of STS were made as described previously (Cameron et al., 1985Go). Both solutions contained ethanol and Tween 20 at final concentrations of 0.1% and 0.01% (v/v), respectively. Spray control (sc) plants of flc were sprayed with deionized water containing the same concentrations of ethanol and Tween. In all cases, leaves and stems were sprayed to the drip point 30 min before the end of the photoperiod, daily from day 9.

Relative humidity treatments
Plants of flc, flc+STS, flc (sc), and not were maintained at a day/night RH of 92/95% throughout the experiments. The other genotypes and treatments were grown under the following RH regimes.

RR: days 4–10, 50/70%; days 11–17, 60/70%; days 18–35, 60/80%.

AC/ days 4–10, 50/70%; days 11–20, 70/80%.

RR+STS: days 4–8, 50/70%; days 9–17, 90/90%; days 18–24, 75/80%; days 25–35, 60/80%.

flc +ABA/ days 4–8, 92/95%; days 9–35, 70/80%.

Leaf water potentials
In each experiment, leaf water potentials were measured during the light and dark periods at least once a week by isopiestic thermocouple psychrometry (Boyer and Knipling, 1965Go). From day 21, samples were excised from the youngest fully expanded leaves (expanded leaves were chosen to avoid errors associated with cell wall relaxation after excision). On days 7 and 14, all leaves were expanding, and samples were excised from the oldest leaves. Sampled leaves were unshaded. On day 7, plants were used for single measurements and then discarded. From day 14 onwards, plants were used for multiple measurements, but were not sampled more than once per time point or twice in one day, or on consecutive days.

Growth analysis and leaf ABA content
Three- or five-week-old plants were harvested for measurements of leaf area using a leaf-area meter (Li-Cor, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA), numbers of main stem and side stem leaves, main stem height, and total shoot, leaf and root dry weights. To avoid effects of tissue sampling on plant development, the plants used for growth analysis were not sampled for leaf water potential measurements, but were grown alongside and otherwise treated identically to the plants used for water potential determinations.

On day 21, leaf ABA content was measured 5–8 h into the light period for RR, flc, flc+ABA, and flc (sc) plants. Exposed leaflets of the second and third youngest leaves on the main stem were harvested, weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried, and finely ground. The flc+ABA samples were briefly (<5 s) rinsed in deionized water after weighing to remove ABA from the leaf surfaces. The flc(sc) samples were treated similarly. The ABA content of the youngest fully expanded leaves was also measured on day 35 for RR, RR+STS, flc+STS and flc (sc) plants. Samples were extracted in deionized water at 4 °C for 16–20 h, and duplicate measurements of ABA content were made by radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody (AFRC MAC 252; Quarrie et al., 1988Go). Validation of the assay for tomato leaves by parallel GC-MS was reported previously (Mulholland, 1994Go).

Leaf ethylene evolution
Ethylene evolution rate was measured from the youngest three leaves of the main stem at weekly intervals for RR, flc, flc+ABA and flc (sc) plants. Two samples per plant were harvested 5–8 h into the light period, each comprising all the leaflets from one side of the petioles, giving a fresh weight of 0.5–1.0 g per sample (measured after ethylene determination). Each sample was immediately placed in a 60 ml syringe, which was then sealed. After approximately 5 min (determined precisely for each measurement), 50 ml of the air in the syringe was injected into a cold trap and the ethylene content measured using a GC equipped with a photoionization detector, as described previously (Spollen et al., 2000Go). The total amount of ethylene evolved was calculated by correcting for the volume of air remaining in the syringe (sample volume was estimated by placing the leaflets in a glass vial of known volume, and weighing the amount of water required to fill the vial). Preliminary experiments with RR and flc plants showed that the rate of ethylene evolution was steady for about 15 min after excision and then increased substantially, presumably due to wounding. Therefore, the reported measurements are considered to be good estimates of the rate of evolution by leaves of intact plants (Jackson and Campbell, 1976Go).

Statistical analysis
Analyses of variance were performed with means compared using Fischer's least significant difference test at the P=0.05 or 0.1 level.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Leaf water potentials of flc and RR
Leaf water potentials of flc plants grown for 35 d after emergence at a constant day/night RH regime of 92/95% increased from a minimum of -0.5 MPa during day 7 to a maximum approaching -0.2 MPa during the final days of the experiment (Fig. 1A–EGo). Measurements made 1 h into the light period were above -0.4 MPa from day 14 (Fig. 1AGo). Water potentials were not substantially different during the light and dark periods (Fig. 1B-EGo), consistent with reports that the stomata tend to remain open in darkness and the plant hydraulic conductance decreases late in the day (Tal, 1966Go; Bradford, 1983Go). The RH conditions that were necessary to achieve equal or lower leaf water potentials in RR compared to flc plants during both the light and dark periods throughout the experimental period were then established. Results obtained from a set of RR plants grown under these conditions are shown in Fig. 1A–EGo. It should be noted that cell wall relaxation after excision may have caused the measured leaf water potentials in both flc and RR plants to be erroneously low prior to day 21, due to the unavoidable sampling of growing leaves.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Leaf water potentials of RR and flc plants during 35 d after emergence. Measurements were made 1 h into the light period once a week until day 21 and then every day (A). Measurements were made at additional times during the light and dark periods once a week (B–E). The dark period is represented by the shaded portions of the abscissa. Data are means±standard error (A, n=3; B–E, n=3–6).

 
To confirm that water potentials of growing leaves remained equal or lower in RR than in flc later in the experiment, measurements were made on day 26 using a pressure chamber (Boyer, 1967Go). The upper main stem including the three youngest leaves (as sampled for ethylene measurements; see below) was sampled 7 h into the light period. Results for flc and RR were not significantly different at the 0.05 level (means±standard error [n=7]: flc , -0.25±0.04 MPa; RR, -0.34±0.03 MPa).

To examine the effects of spraying flc plants with ABA, leaf water potentials were first measured in spray control plants. This treatment caused leaf water potentials to be as much as 0.2 MPa lower than in untreated flc plants on days 14 and 21 (Table 1Go, compare with Fig. 1C–EGo), possibly due to effects of spraying on cuticular conductance. Equal or lower water potentials in flc +ABA compared to flc (sc) plants were achieved by changing the RH regime to 70/80% at the onset of the ABA treatment (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Leaf water potentials of flc (sc) and flc+ABA plants (RR background) at weekly intervals during 35 d after emergence

Treatments began on day 9. Measurements were made 8 h into both the light and dark periods (Day and Night, respectively). Data are means±standard error (n=3).

 

Growth and leaf ABA content of flc and RR
Most parameters of shoot growth were substantially inhibited in flc compared to RR plants (Table 2Go), despite the fact that leaf water potentials were higher in flc throughout development. Representative plants at the end of the experiment are illustrated in Fig. 2A–BGo. Total leaf area was 39% and 48% less in flc on days 21 and 35, respectively. This was entirely attributable to reduced leaf expansion, since the number of both main stem and side stem leaves was increased by about 20% at both times (increases were significant at the 0.05 level except for side stem leaf number on day 21). On day 21, total leaf and whole shoot dry weights were 38% and 28% less, respectively, in flc compared to RR, and by day 35 both parameters in flc were only approximately 40% of the RR values. In contrast, main stem height was 25% greater in flc than in RR plants on day 21. However, this effect was not sustained, and by day 35 stem height was 25% smaller in flc compared to RR plants. The ABA content of the growing leaves of flc was 33% of the level in RR plants on day 21 (Table 3Go). The values are similar to those reported earlier (Taylor, 1987Go) for flc (AC background) grown at high RH.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Growth analysis of RR, flc, flc (sc) and flc+ABA plants

Plants were harvested 21 d and 35 d after emergence in the same experiments as those in which leaf water potentials were measured (Fig. 1Go, Table 1Go). Data are means±standard error (n=4–6). For each parameter on each day, values followed by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 level. The experiments were repeated with similar results.

 


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Representative plants of (A) RR, (B) flc, (C) flc+ABA, and (D) flc (sc) 35 d after emergence. Plants are from the experiments presented in Table 2Go.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Leaf ABA content of RR, flc, flc (sc) and flc+ABA plants

Plants were grown as described in Fig. 1Go and Table 1Go, and measurements were made 21 d after emergence. Data are means±standard error (n=5). Values followed by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 level. The experiments were repeated with similar results. FW, fresh weight.

 
There were no significant differences in shoot growth parameters of flc (sc) compared to untreated flc plants, except for main stem height which was slightly decreased (Table 2Go; Fig. 2D)Go. Also, the ABA content was not significantly different in the flc (sc) and flc plants (Table 3Go). The leaf ABA content in flc +ABA plants was restored to the value in RR plants, and this treatment resulted in substantial restoration of shoot growth by day 35 (Table 2Go; Fig. 2CGo). The improvement in growth occurred despite the fact that leaf water potentials were equal or lower in flc +ABA plants than in the other treatments throughout the experiment. The ABA treatment nearly doubled the total leaf area of flc ; restoration relative to RR plants was 75%. This was due entirely to recovery of leaf expansion, since the numbers of main stem and side stem leaves were significantly decreased and unaffected, respectively. The ABA treatment also restored total leaf and shoot dry weights and stem height by 32–55% from the values of the flc (sc) plants.

Root growth was also substantially reduced in flc compared to RR plants (Table 2Go). On day 35, root dry weight was inhibited by 74% compared to the 60% inhibition of shoot dry weight. A greater restriction of root than shoot growth in flc has also been reported previously (Bradford, 1983Go). The ABA treatment slightly increased root dry weight of flc, although not significantly when compared to the flc (sc) plants.

Leaf water potentials and growth of flc, not and AC
Similar experiments were conducted using flc in the AC background and not (also in the AC background). The second background of flc was included to test for consistency of phenotype, and not was studied to strengthen the conclusion that the impairment of growth in flc is due to ABA deficiency rather than to pleiotropic effects of the mutation. (In flc , conversion of ABA aldehyde to ABA is inhibited because synthesis of the molybdenum cofactor required for activity of ABA aldehyde oxidase is impaired by this genetic lesion. Enzymes which are not involved in ABA biosynthesis that depend on the same form of the cofactor, for example, xanthine dehydrogenase, will therefore also be impaired in flc [Marin and Marion-Poll, 1997Go].)

Leaf water potentials of flc and not ranged between -0.6 and -0.3 MPa throughout the 20 d experiments (Table 4Go). Water potentials of AC plants were similar to or lower than those of the mutants at all times. Despite this, total leaf area and leaf, shoot and root dry weights were substantially inhibited in both mutants compared to AC plants (Table 5Go). For all parameters, the inhibition was greater in flc than in not. For example, leaf area was 58% less in flc and 37% less in not. This finding is consistent with comparisons of these mutants when grown without control of water balance and correlates with lower ABA contents in flc (Taylor and Tarr, 1984Go; Neill and Horgan, 1985Go; ABA contents were not measured in the present study). The inhibition of leaf area development was again entirely attributable to reduced leaf expansion, since leaf numbers were not significantly different between the mutants and AC plants.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Leaf water potentials of AC, flc and not plants at weekly intervals during 20 d after emergence

Measurements were made 8 h into both the light and dark periods (Day and Night, respectively). Data are means±standard error (n=3).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Growth analysis of AC, flc and not plants

Plants were harvested 20 d after emergence in the same experiments as those in which leaf water potentials were measured (Table 4Go). Data are means±standard error (n=5). For each parameter, values followed by the same letter are significantly different at the 0.05 level. The experiments were repeated with similar results.

 
Stem height was not increased in either flc or not compared to AC plants at day 20 (Table 5Go), in contrast to the results on day 21 for flc in the RR background (Table 2Go). However, an additional experiment showed that flc plants were significantly taller than AC plants prior to this time; the maximum increase was 27% on day 15. A similar trend was observed in not, although in this case the increase was not significant.

Leaf ethylene evolution and effects of STS in flc and RR
Plants of flc (in both backgrounds) and not exhibited substantial adventitious rooting and leaf epinasty, and both symptoms were essentially absent in the flc + ABA plants (Figs 2Go, 3Go). These characteristics did not occur in wild-type plants under either their normal conditions or the high-RH conditions in which the mutants were grown.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Basal region of the main stem showing adventitious rooting for (A) flc (RR background), (B) flc (AC background) and (C) not plants 35 d after emergence. Panel (D) shows that adventitious rooting was almost completely absent in flc+ABA plants (RR background).

 
Although these symptoms are characteristic of excess ethylene (Abeles et al., 1992Go), it is uncertain whether the mutants produce more ethylene than wild-type plants, particularly when shoot water deficits are prevented. There are only two studies of ethylene evolution in flc, and one of not. Tal et al. reported that evolution was enhanced in flc, but found that this effect was prevented in young (although not older) plants grown at high RH, suggesting that water deficits played an important role (Tal et al., 1979Go). A small increase in evolution in not compared to wild-type plants growing in compacted soil has also been reported (Hussain et al., 1999bGo). In contrast, Neill et al. found no evidence that evolution was increased in flc even though the plants were grown in a greenhouse without humidity control (Neill et al., 1986Go). The explanation for the conflicting results in flc is unclear, partly because the measurements included unknown contributions from wound-induced ethylene (evolution was measured from excised shoots or leaves over 24 h and 8 h, respectively, in Tal et al., 1979Go, and Neill et al., 1986Go). Therefore, ethylene evolution in flc in the absence of shoot water deficits was reassessed.

Pre-wound measurements of growing main stem leaves showed that ethylene evolution rate was doubled in flc compared to RR plants at 21 d after emergence, and that this effect was prevented in the plants treated with ABA (Table 6Go). Ethylene evolution was not significantly different in flc and flc (sc) plants. Preliminary experiments showed that ethylene evolution was similarly enhanced on day 14, at which time the plants had the same number of leaves as the young plants studied by Tal et al. (Tal et al., 1979Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Leaf ethylene evolution rate of RR, flc, flc (sc) and flc+ABA plants

Plants were grown as described in Fig. 1Go and Table 1Go, and measurements were made 21 d after emergence. Data are means±standard error (n=5–18). Values followed by different letters are significantly different at the 0.1 level. The experiments were repeated with similar results. FW, fresh weight.

 
To assess whether ethylene was a cause of the inhibition of shoot growth in flc, plants of RR and flc were sprayed with STS daily from day 9. In the RR+STS treatment, shoot growth parameters on day 35 (not shown) were not significantly different from the untreated RR plants shown in Table 2Go, except for total leaf dry weight which was reduced by 16%. Leaf water potentials and ABA content (not shown) were also very similar to those of untreated RR plants. In flc, on the other hand, the STS treatment resulted in significant increases in main stem (although not side stem) leaf area and dry weight, stem height and total shoot dry weight compared to flc (sc) plants (Table 7Go). For these parameters, restoration relative to RR+STS plants ranged from 25–50%. The STS treatment also resulted in a 37% restoration of root dry weight. The restoration of main stem leaf area was entirely attributable to recovery of leaf expansion, since the number of main stem leaves was significantly decreased. Leaf water potentials and ABA content (not shown) were very similar to those of flc (sc) plants, showing that the restoration of growth did not result from increases in plant water status or ABA levels. The explanation for the lack of effect of STS on side stem leaf area is not known. Preliminary measurements on day 28 showed that these leaves also exhibited enhanced ethylene evolution in flc.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Growth analysis of flc+STS plants (RR background)

Plants were harvested 35 d after emergence. Data are means±standard error (n=5). The experiment was repeated with similar results. For parameters that were significantly different from the flc (sc) treatment (*0.1 level, **0.05 level; flc (sc) data from Table 2Go), restoration was calculated relative to RR+STS plants. Growth of RR+STS plants is described in the text.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of this study demonstrate that most parameters of shoot growth remained greatly impaired in flc and not in the absence of shoot water deficits. Root growth was also greatly reduced compared to wild-type plants. Additional experiments with flc showed that shoot growth substantially recovered when wild-type levels of ABA were restored by treatment with exogenous ABA, even though improvement in shoot water status was prevented. The ability of applied ABA to restore growth was greatest for leaf expansion. It is concluded that normal levels of endogenous ABA are required to maintain shoot development, particularly leaf expansion, in well-watered tomato plants, independently of effects on plant water balance. Consistent with this conclusion, Mulholland et al. reported that leaf growth of barley growing in compacted soil was more inhibited in an ABA-deficient mutant than in the wild type, and the evidence suggested that changes in water relations were not the cause (Mulholland et al., 1996aGo, bGo). It should be noted that, in contrast, it has been shown that ABA-deficiency in maize seedlings at low water potentials was associated with increased shoot growth, indicating that ABA accumulation was causally related to shoot growth inhibition (Saab et al., 1990Go). This finding is discussed further below.

It is noteworthy that the inhibition of leaf area and shoot dry weight in flc compared to RR plants was comparable to that reported previously (Bradford, 1983Go). In that study, plants were grown in a greenhouse with uncontrolled humidity, and leaf water potentials were substantially lower in flc than in the wild type. Similarly, the inhibition of leaf area in not was comparable to that reported for greenhouse-grown plants (Taylor and Tarr, 1984Go). Further, the restoration of leaf area in ABA-treated flc plants was considerably greater than that reported earlier (Bradford, 1983Go), despite the fact that leaf water potentials increased in that study. These comparisons suggest that non-hydraulic effects of ABA-deficiency are the major cause of shoot growth inhibition in flc and not even when moderate shoot water deficits occur.

There were two exceptions to the trend of decreased shoot growth in the mutants. First, the number of leaves was either unaffected or slightly increased. A small increase in the rate of leaf production has also been reported previously in flc (Tal and Imber, 1970Go) and in flc, not and sit (Jones et al., 1987Go). These findings indicate that endogenous ABA inhibits leaf initiation, in contrast to its promotive effect on leaf expansion. Second, the mutants initially exhibited a faster rate of stem elongation than wild-type plants. A similar finding that 7-week-old plants of flc, not and sit grown under mist were all taller than the wild type has also been reported (Jones et al., 1987Go). In the present study, however, this effect was observed only at or prior to 21 d after emergence. In older flc plants, the effect of ABA deficiency on stem elongation reversed and the mutant became substantially shorter than RR plants. Similar to our findings, double and triple mutants of flc, not and sit grown at high RH exhibited greater stem heights than the wild type during the first 25 d after sowing, but the effect was reversed by 36 d (Tarr, 1993Go). In another study, stem height was slightly greater in flc only until 40 d from sowing (Bradford, 1983Go). Thus, endogenous ABA appears to inhibit stem elongation in young tomato plants but to maintain stem growth at later stages of development.

It should be noted that since each leaf is produced at a node, the increased number of main stem leaves in flc compared to RR plants would have been associated with an increased number of stem internodes (not measured). Therefore, the greater stem elongation in flc at 21 d after emergence may have been partially (if not wholly) attributable to an increase in internode number rather than individual internode expansion. In older plants, the reduced stem elongation in flc despite its greater leaf number indicates that internode expansion was inhibited compared to the wild type.

Involvement of ethylene
The results establish that ABA-deficiency in flc causes an increased rate of ethylene production independently of effects on plant water balance. Although enhanced ethylene production has been reported previously in ABA-deficient mutants of tomato (Tal et al., 1979Go; Hussain et al., 1999bGo) and Arabidopsis (Rakitina et al., 1994Go), the extent to which the increase in those studies was a direct result of ABA deficiency or an indirect result of decreased plant water status was not known. (There are many reports that ethylene production can be increased by plant water deficits [although see Morgan et al., 1990Go].)

Moreover, the partial recovery of shoot growth in STS-treated flc shows that the impairment of growth caused by ABA-deficiency is at least partly attributable to ethylene. These conclusions are similar to our recent finding that an important role of ABA accumulation in the maintenance of root elongation at low water potentials in maize seedlings is to limit ethylene production (Spollen et al., 2000Go). The full extent to which ethylene accounts for shoot growth inhibition in flc cannot be assessed from these experiments, however, because spraying with STS concentrations higher than 250 µM resulted in the development of severe toxicity symptoms. (In the short-term experiments with ABA-deficient maize seedlings, a STS concentration of 2.5 mM was optimal for root growth restoration [Spollen et al., 2000Go]). Therefore, it is possible that ABA has another function in maintaining shoot growth in addition to prevention of excess ethylene production. It should also be noted that these results do not exclude the possibility that the sensitivity of growth to ethylene was also increased by ABA deficiency.

Restriction of ethylene synthesis or sensitivity also appears to explain the earlier finding from this laboratory, noted above, that ABA deficiency caused increased shoot growth in maize seedlings at low water potentials (Saab et al., 1990Go). Preliminary experiments showed that growth promotion could be prevented by treatment with STS, and that shoot growth could also be increased by applying the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate or ethylene (Feng, 1996Go). These findings are consistent with reports that ethylene stimulates mesocotyl growth in some species (Suge, 1971Go; Cornforth and Stevens, 1973Go). Further, there are a few reports that ethylene can promote stem elongation (Poovaiah and Leopold, 1973Go; Van Andel and Verkerke, 1978Go); such an effect may contribute to the small promotion of stem height in the ABA-deficient tomato mutants early in development.

The commonality of these observations suggests that restriction of ethylene production may be a widespread function of ABA. Further, because ethylene is usually inhibitory to shoot growth of terrestrial plants at later stages of development and under various environmental conditions (Abeles et al., 1992Go; Lee and Reid, 1997Go; Hussain et al., 1999aGo), the finding that endogenous ABA maintains rather than inhibits shoot growth in tomato may generally apply.


    Acknowledgments
 
We would like to thank Drs Ian Taylor and Stephen Pallardy for helpful discussions and Dr Stephen Pallardy for making the pressure chamber measurements and for use of the leaf area machine. This research was supported by award no. 95–37100–1601 from the NRI Competitive Grants Program/US Department of Agriculture and by the University of Missouri Food for the 21st Century Program. This is contribution no. 13 000 from the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series.


    Notes
 
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +1 573 882 1469. E-mail: SharpR{at}missouri.edu Back

2 Present address: HRI-East Malling, West Malling, Kent ME19 6BJ, UK. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit Jr ME.1992. Ethylene in plant biology, 2nd edn. San Diego: Academic Press.

Abou-Mandour AA, Hartung W.1992. Abscisic acid in unstressed callus cultures of wilting mutants of tomato. A possible role of ABA for plant regeneration. Angewandte Botanik 66, 85–88.

Beyer Jr EM.1976. A potent inhibitor of ethylene action in plants. Plant Physiology 58, 268–271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boyer JS.1967. Leaf water potentials measured with a pressure chamber. Plant Physiology 42, 133–137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boyer JS, Knipling EB.1965. Isopiestic technique for measuring leaf water potentials with a thermocouple psychrometer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 54, 1044–1051.[Free Full Text]

Bradford KJ.1983. Water relations and growth of the flacca tomato mutant in relation to abscisic acid. Plant Physiology 72, 251–255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bradford KJ, Hsiao TC.1982. Physiological responses to moderate water stress. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Zeigler H, eds. Encyclopedia of plant physiology (New Series), Vol. 12B, Physiological plant ecology II. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 263–324.

Burbidge A, Grieve TM, Jackson A, Thompson A, McCarty DR, Taylor IB.1999. Characterization of the ABA-deficient tomato mutant notabilis and its relationship with maize Vp14. The Plant Journal 17, 427–431.[ISI][Medline]

Cameron AC, Heins RD, Fonda HN.1985. Influence of storage and mixing factors on the biological activity of silver thiosulfate. Scientia Horticulturae 26, 167–174.

Cornforth IS, Stevens RJ.1973. Ethylene and the germination and early growth of barley. Plant and Soil 38, 581–587.

Davies PJ.1995.Plant hormones. Physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology, 2nd edn. Dortrecht: Kluwer.

Feng X.1996. Is ABA an inhibitor or promoter of shoot growth in water-stressed plants? MS thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.

Hussain A, Black CR, Taylor IB, Roberts JA.1999a. Soil compaction. A role for ethylene in regulating leaf expansion and shoot growth in tomato? Plant Physiology 121, 1227–1237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hussain A, Roberts JA, Black CR, Taylor IB.1999b. Soil compaction: Is there an ABA-ethylene relationship regulating leaf expansion in tomato? In: Kanellis AK, Chang C, Klee H, Bleeker AB, Pech JC, Grierson D, eds. Biotechnology of the plant hormone ethylene II. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 187–188.

Imber D, Tal M.1970. Phenotypic reversion of flacca, a wilty mutant of tomato, by abscisic acid. Science 169, 592–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jackson MB, Campbell DJ.1976. Production of ethylene by excised segments of plant tissue prior to the effect of wounding. Planta 129, 273–274.

Jones HG, Sharp CS, Higgs KH.1987. Growth and water relations of wilty mutants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Journal of Experimental Botany 38, 1848–1856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee SH, Reid DM.1997. The role of endogenous ethylene in the expansion of Helianthus annuus leaves. Canadian Journal of Botany 75, 501–508.

Léon-Kloosterziel KM, Alvaraz Gil M, Ruijs GJ, Jacobsen SE, Olszewski NE, Schwartz SH, Zeevaart JAD, Koornneef M.1996. Isolation and characterization of abscisic acid-deficient Arabidopsis mutants at two new loci. The Plant Journal 10, 655–661.[ISI][Medline]

Marin A, Marion-Poll A.1997. Tomato flacca mutant is impaired in ABA aldehyde oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase activities. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 35, 369–372.

Morgan PW, He C-J, De Greef JA, De Proft MP.1990. Does water deficit stress promote ethylene synthesis by intact plants? Plant Physiology 94, 1616–1624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mulholland BJ.1994. Soil compaction and plant growth: the role of root-sourced chemical signals. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.

Mulholland BJ, Black CR, Taylor IB, Roberts JA, Lenton JR.1996a. Effect of soil compaction on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) growth. I. Possible role for ABA as a root-sourced chemical signal. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 539–549.

Mulholland BJ, Taylor IB, Black CR, Roberts JA.1996b. Effect of soil compaction on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) growth. II. Are increased xylem sap ABA concentrations involved in maintaining leaf expansion in compacted soils? Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 551–556.

Munns R, Cramer GR.1996. Is coordination of leaf and root growth mediated by abscisic acid? Opinion. Plant and Soil 185, 33–49.

Nagel OW, Konings H, Lambers H.1994. Growth rate, plant development and water relations of the ABA-deficient tomato mutant sitiens. Physiologia Plantarum 92, 102–108.

Neill SJ, Horgan R.1985. Abscisic acid production and water relations in wilty tomato mutants subjected to water deficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 36, 1222–1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Neill SJ, McGaw BA, Horgan R.1986. Ethylene and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid production in flacca, a wilty mutant of tomato, subjected to water deficiency and pre-treatment with abscisic acid. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 535–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Poovaiah BW, Leopold AC.1973. Effects of ethephon on growth of grasses. Crop Science 13, 755–758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Puri J, Tal M.1977. Abnormal stomatal behavior and hormonal imbalance in flacca, a wilty mutant of tomato. IV. Effect of abscisic acid and water content on RNase activity and RNA. Plant Physiology 59, 173–177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Quarrie SA.1987. Use of genotypes differing in endogenous abscisic acid levels in studies of physiology and development. In: Hoad GV, Lenton JR, Jackson MB, Atkin RK, eds. Hormone action in plant development—a critical appraisal. London: Butterworths, 89–105.

Quarrie SA, Whitford PN, Appleford NEJ, Wang TL, Cook SK, Henson IE, Loveys BR.1988. A monoclonal antibody to (S)-abscisic acid: its characterization and use in a radioimmunoassay for measuring abscisic acid in crude extracts of cereal and lupin leaves. Planta 173, 330–339.[ISI]

Rakitina T Ya, Vlasov PV, Jalilova F Kh, Kefeli VI.1994. Abscisic acid and ethylene in mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana differing in their resistance to ultraviolet (UV-B) radiation stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 41, 599–603.

Saab IN, Sharp RE, Pritchard J, Voetberg GS.1990. Increased endogenous abscisic acid maintains primary root growth and inhibits shoot growth of maize seedlings at low water potentials. Plant Physiology 93, 1329–1336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sharp RE, Wu Y, Voetberg GS, Saab IN, LeNoble ME.1994. Confirmation that abscisic acid accumulation is required for maize primary root elongation at low water potentials. Journal of Experimental Botany 45, 1743–1751.[ISI]

Spollen WG, LeNoble ME, Samuels TD, Bernstein N, Sharp RE.2000. Abscisic acid accumulation maintains maize primary root elongation at low water potentials by restricting ethylene production. Plant Physiology 122, 967–976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Suge H.1971. Stimulation of oat and rice mesocotyl growth by ethylene. Plant and Cell Physiology 12, 831–837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tal M.1966. Abnormal stomatal behavior in wilty mutants of tomato. Plant Physiology 41, 1387–1391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tal M, Imber D.1970. Abnormal stomatal behavior and hormonal imbalance in flacca, a wilty mutant of tomato. II. Auxin- and abscisic acid-like activity. Plant Physiology 46, 373–376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tal M, Imber D, Erez A, Epstein E.1979. Abnormal stomatal behavior and hormonal imbalance in flacca, a wilty mutant of tomato. V. Effect of abscisic acid on indoleacetic acid metabolism and ethylene evolution. Plant Physiology 63, 1044–1048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tal M, Nevo Y.1973. Abnormal stomatal behavior and root resistance, and hormonal imbalance in three wilty mutants of tomato. Biochemical Genetics 8, 291–300.[ISI][Medline]

Tarr AR.1993. Genetically induced abscisic acid deficiencies. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.

Taylor IB.1987. ABA-deficient tomato mutants. In: Thomas H, Grierson D, eds. Developmental mutants in plants, SEB seminar series 32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–217.

Taylor IB, Linforth RST, Al-Naieb RJ, Bowman WR, Marples BA.1988. The wilty tomato mutants flacca and sitiens are impaired in the oxidation of ABA-aldehyde to ABA. Plant, Cell and Environment 11, 739–745.

Taylor IB, Tarr AR.1984. Phenotypic interactions between abscisic acid-deficient tomato mutants. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 68, 115–119.

Trewavas AJ, Jones HG.1991. An assessment of the role of ABA in plant development. In: Davies WJ, Jones HG, eds. Abscisic acid: physiology and biochemistry. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers, 169–188.

Van Andel OM, Verkerke DR.1978. Stimulation and inhibition by ethephon of stem and leaf growth of some gramineae at different stages of development. Journal of Experimental Botany 29, 639–651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wright STC.1980. The effect of plant growth regulator treatments on the levels of ethylene emanating from excised turgid and wilted wheat leaves. Planta 148, 381–388.

Zeevaart JAD, Creelman RA.1988. Metabolism and physiology of abscisic acid. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 39, 439–473.[ISI]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. E. Ghanem, A. Albacete, C. Martinez-Andujar, M. Acosta, R. Romero-Aranda, I. C. Dodd, S. Lutts, and F. Perez-Alfocea
Hormonal changes during salinity-induced leaf senescence in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2008; 59(11): 3039 - 3050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. J. Thompson, J. Andrews, B. J. Mulholland, J. M.T. McKee, H. W. Hilton, J. S. Horridge, G. D. Farquhar, R. C. Smeeton, I. R.A. Smillie, C. R. Black, et al.
Overproduction of Abscisic Acid in Tomato Increases Transpiration Efficiency and Root Hydraulic Conductivity and Influences Leaf Expansion
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2007; 143(4): 1905 - 1917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. Rosado, I. Amaya, V. Valpuesta, J. Cuartero, M. A. Botella, and O. Borsani
ABA- and ethylene-mediated responses in osmotically stressed tomato are regulated by the TSS2 and TOS1 loci
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2006; 57(12): 3327 - 3335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. Munns, R. A. James, and A. Lauchli
Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(5): 1025 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. Yang, J. Zhang, Z. Wang, K. Liu, and P. Wang
Post-anthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in rice in relation to abscisic acid and ethylene
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(1): 149 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. M. Barrero, P. Piqueras, M. Gonzalez-Guzman, R. Serrano, P. L. Rodriguez, M. R. Ponce, and J. L. Micol
A mutational analysis of the ABA1 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana highlights the involvement of ABA in vegetative development
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2005; 56(418): 2071 - 2083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Y. S. Rahayu, P. Walch-Liu, G. Neumann, V. Romheld, N. von Wiren, and F. Bangerth
Root-derived cytokinins as long-distance signals for NO3--induced stimulation of leaf growth
J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2005; 56(414): 1143 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]